2012년 11월 29일 목요일

1000 characters



           Due to the characteristics of specialized high schools, it should remain. Since they provide students to study deep insight, it can be the best way to produce generalists, if they made their future stance clearly, for example Science High schools. Not only professionalized education, specialized schools also provide students experiences on various fields that normal schools don’t provide.
           Because the election season has returned, the opposition party’s nominee says that the specialized high schools are the major problems for old-boy network and private education. But the root cause of these problems is the levels between universities. Why downward standardizing? Can’t it be upward standardizing, or specializing?
           Without providing any measures for public normal educations, the slogan to make specialized high schools to normal schools is not more than the example of populism.

댓글 1개:

  1. I agree and really think any attempt to get rid of our kind of school is completely out of touch with reality and freedom of choice. But what is your opinion? You think we should keep them, but are you making an argument against this or just mentioning Moon's? Some good sentences, but generally a bit wonky in terms of grammar. Need more of your opinion and a closer interpretation of the prompt.

    답글삭제